The Hedgehog Review

The Hedgehog Review: Vol. 18 No. 2 (Summer 2016)

Symposium: On the Business of Philosophy

The Hedgehog Review

The Hedgehog Review: Summer 2016

(Volume 18 | Issue 2)

By the time Richard Rorty delivered the Page-Barbour lectures at the University of Virginia, in 2004, the main outlines of his thought were known far beyond philosophical circles, arguably having a greater influence on other academic fields and even the wider intellectual culture. Whether he liked it or not—and mostly he did not—Rorty was strongly identified with postmodernism, a broad intellectual movement characterized by, among other things, a posture of suspicion toward all “grand narratives” and systematic attempts to establish ultimate truths. In his landmark 1979 book, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, he spoke across the two reigning and antagonistic philosophical schools (the analytic and the continental) to assert the futility of all efforts to represent or “mirror” what reality truly is. Rorty, however, chafed at the label relativist. He saw himself as an American pragmatist in a line descending from William James and John Dewey. As such, he took “truth” to be simply the highest accolade a community of thinkers can bestow on what it agrees is, for a time, the most convincing account of something. So what, then, is the proper business of philosophy? What should philosophers get on with? Which pursuits should they cede to others, and to whom should they cede them? From his 1979 book until his death in 2007, Rorty reprised and sharpened answers to those questions, perhaps nowhere more succinctly than in his Page-Barbour lectures, soon to be issued by the University of Virginia Press under the title Philosophy as Poetry. In the spirit of the ancient symposium, we offer one of those previously unpublished lectures, along with the responses of three contemporary philosophers who, for different reasons, take issue with Rorty’s position.

Read More

Universalist Grandeur and Analytic Philosophy

Richard Rorty

Pining Away in the Midst of Plenty: The Irony of Rorty’s Either/Or Philosophy

Susan Haack

Rorty’s Idealism

Matthew B. Crawford

Just Who Is It That We Have Become? Rorty’s Hegelianism

Robert B. Pippin

Reprinted from The Hedgehog Review 18.2 (Summer 2016). This essay may not be resold, reprinted, or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission. Please contact The Hedgehog Review for further details.

Who We Are

Published three times a year by the Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture, The Hedgehog Review offers critical reflections on contemporary culture—how we shape it, and how it shapes us.

IASC Home | Research | Scholars | Events | Support

IASC Newsletter Signup

First Name Last Name Email Address

Follow Us . . . FacebookTwitter