Tag Archives: Prospect Magazine

The Hedgehog’s Array: October 24, 2014

hedgehog array logo_FLAT_72dpi[3]
Notable reads from last week:

“Ben Bradlee, legendary Washington Post editor, dies at 93,” Robert G. Kaiser
“For Benjamin Bradlee, journalism was more than a profession—it was a public good vital to our democracy.”

“One-Fifth of Detroit’s Population Could Lose Their Homes,” Rose Hackman
“Many families could stay put for just a few hundred dollars, if only they knew how to work the system.”

“The Money Midterms: A Scandal in Slow Motion,” Evan Osnos
“The elections on November 4th are on pace to be the most expensive midterms in history (even adjusting for inflation).”

“Speed Kills,” Mark C. Taylor
“Fast is never fast enough.”

“Inside Twitter’s Ambitious Plan to Kill the Password,” Casey Newton
“Can some powerful new features reset Twitter’s relationship with developers?”

“What is the Value of Toleration,” Piers Bann
“Is the defense of free speech and toleration merely another name for indifference?”

“The International-Student Revolving Door,” Albert H. Teich
“Foreign students shouldn’t have to prove they’ll go home after graduating to get a visa.”

“Obama Talks Up Net Neutrality, But Could Do More to Defend It,” Brendan Sasso
“Obama has avoided taking a position on the most controversial piece of the net-neutrality debate: what authority the FCC should use to enact new open-Internet regulations.”

Plus:

Our own Jay Tolson went on Charlottesville’s WTJU to talk about the “War on Poverty” and preview the fall issue of The Hedgehog Review “Thinking About the Poor”—on newsstands November 1! Listen to the interview here! Subscribe to The Hedgehog Review today!

. . . . . . . .

Like The Hedgehog Review on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to our posts via RSS.

FacebookTwitterLinkedInGoogle+Share

Self-Knowledge in the Age of the Digital Panopticon

A short piece in the British thought journal Prospect, “Quantified Self: The Algorithm of Life,” reminds me once again that satire of the dystopian variety can barely keep up with what the real world throws at us every day.

Betham's drawing of a Panopticon

Drawing of Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon (Wikipedia Commons)

I have in mind the recent novel by Dave Eggers, The Circle, which follows the career of a bright young thing who becomes a rising star in the utimate tech company, a sort of hybrid of Google, Facebook, and half a dozen other cutting-edge cool shops. The Circle, as the eponymous firm is called, puts all your social media and personal digital data together and allows you to accesss them under your own uber-password. It provides one-stop shopping for those who want to be connected to everything, even while seeing to it that those connections (and, of course, the personal data) are assiduously monitored, stored, and exploited to bring you even more of what you don’t yet know you want.

But a digital panopticon fulfilling Jeremy Bentham’s vision of the relentlessly surveilled life is so close to being realized in the real world that it almost puts Eggers’ fictive imaginings to shame.  Josh Cohen in his Prospect piece describes a tech-driven movement of self-quantification that comports perfectly with the world of the Circle, even bringing to it a higher, finer resolution:

Quantified Self (QS) is a growing global movement selling a new form of wisdom, encapsulated in the slogan “self-knowledge through numbers”. Rooted in the American tech scene, it encourages people to monitor all aspects of their physical, emotional, cognitive, social, domestic and working lives. The wearable cameras that enable you to broadcast your life minute by minute; the Nano-sensors that can be installed in any region of the body to track vital functions from blood pressure to cholesterol intake, the voice recorders that pick up the sound of your sleeping self or your baby’s babble—together, these devices can provide you with the means to regain control over your fugitive life.

This vision has traction at a time when our daily lives, as the Snowden leaks have revealed, are being lived in the shadow of state agencies, private corporations and terrorist networks—overwhelming yet invisible forces that leave us feeling powerless to maintain boundaries around our private selves. In a world where our personal data appears vulnerable to intrusion and exploitation, a movement that effectively encourages you to become your own spy is bound to resonate. Surveillance technologies will put us back in the centre of the lives from which they’d displaced us. Our authoritative command of our physiological and behavioural “numbers” can assure us that after all, no one knows us better than we do.

No, Cohen does not believe this.  He knows that there is no end to the monitoring and the new devices, no end to “more data accumulated and shared.” But he is concerned less with the loss of privacy than he is with the misguided search for self-knowledge through more and finer quantitative measurements. He eloquently describes the panic that may begin to set in even at the outset of such a quantitative quest, a panic that, if not suppressed by other technological measurements, may lead to a valuable insight:  “Perhaps the self you really want to know, and that always eludes you, is the one that can’t be quantified.”

True, of course. But perhaps the saddest thing about Cohen’s lament is how it registers on the mind of even one who agrees:  How quaint Cohen sounds.  How truly quaint.

. . . . . . . .

Like The Hedgehog Review on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to our posts via RSS.